Skip to content
DOSL Skyline
Contact us

Adjust maadbeda.

Brochure nodbeda. Read the record.

A free account

  • Search every registered project by name, survey or RERA number
  • Save projects to My list and your own lists
  • The map and every layer, free with your account
  • No card needed

It costs nothing. Your email only signs you in.

DOSL

Your free account

No password, no card, no commitment. We email a code that works once, simply.

No spam calls. We never ask for your phone number.

Built from 100+ public records and registers, K-RERA filings first · No broker, no listing fees

Products

DOSL SkylineDOSL PlotlineFor lenders

Use cases

Collateral checksInvestmentHomebuyers

DOSL

How it worksBlogPricing
Contact us

Adjust maadbeda.

Brochure nodbeda. Read the record.

A free account

  • Search every registered project by name, survey or RERA number
  • Save projects to My list and your own lists
  • The map and every layer, free with your account
  • No card needed

It costs nothing. Your email only signs you in.

DOSL

Your free account

No password, no card, no commitment. We email a code that works once, simply.

No spam calls. We never ask for your phone number.

Built from 100+ public records and registers, K-RERA filings first · No broker, no listing fees

As of 29 Oct 2026

Apartment · Indiranagar · head to head

White Lotus Aravindaksa vs White Lotus Tamara

Both are apartment projects in Indiranagar, so the location argument is largely settled and what remains is the paperwork. Everything below is filed with Karnataka RERA or researched from the builder, with the source named on each row.

Where they actually differ

  • Density: White Lotus Aravindaksa is ahead, 12 units/acre against 71 units/acre.
  • Nearest BWSSB main: White Lotus Aravindaksa is ahead, ~358 m to the nearest trunk main against ~614 m to the nearest trunk main.
  • Quoted price per sqft: White Lotus Tamara is ahead, ₹14,650 against ₹15,546.
  • DOSL Score: White Lotus Aravindaksa is ahead, 62 / 100 (B) against 61 / 100 (B).

Side by side

White Lotus Aravindaksa compared with White Lotus Tamara across price, schedule, builder record and land
 White Lotus AravindaksaWhite Lotus Tamara
DOSL Score62 / 100 (B)61 / 100 (B)
Price₹14,263–16,829/sqftbuilder quote, super-built-up, Jul 2026₹14,000–15,300/sqftbuilder quote, super-built-up, Jul 2026
Quoted price per sqftcharged on saleable area, so not directly comparable between projects₹15,546₹14,650
Unit sizes3,500–3,800 sqft1,466–2,692 sqft
StatusReady to moveReady to move
CompletionCompletedCompleted
Units declared910
Densitylower is more open space per home12 units/acre71 units/acre
Nearest BWSSB mainproximity is infrastructure, not a connection~358 m to the nearest trunk main~614 m to the nearest trunk main
Disamenities nearbylandfill, sewage plant, quarry, crematorium, prison or substation close enough to matterlandfill 650 mlandfill 770 m
RERA registration–PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171208/001039

DOSL Score, pillar by pillar

DOSL Score pillars compared
PillarWhite Lotus AravindaksaWhite Lotus Tamara
Land & title10.0 / 2220.0 / 22
Execution13.0 / 225.0 / 22
Builder standing11.0 / 1811.0 / 18
Financial discipline8.0 / 138.0 / 13
Market signal15.0 / 1512.0 / 15
Appreciation outlook5.0 / 105.0 / 10

Each project page lists the reason behind every deduction.

Read either one in full

This page ranks two projects on filed and researched data, not on suitability. It cannot see the things that decide most purchases: which floor, which facing, how the approach road behaves in a downpour, what the neighbours are like. Visit both, in the monsoon if you can, and verify against certified records before you transact.